On March 13, 2026 the Attorney General of Canada submitted its written response to the NCCC's motion for interested party status, stating the NCCC should not be granted interested party status in this proceeding. Canada argues that as the third body tasked with acting as the principal voice of the First Nations-in-Assembly in these proceedings, the NCCC’s intervention is unnecessary, disproportionate, and will result in duplication, disorder and delay. 

On March 13, 2026 COO and NAN submitted their joint response to the Tribunal regarding the NCCC's Notion of Motion seeking interested Party Status, stating there is no reason to allow the NCCC to participate to the proceedings as they represent the same interests as the AFN and therefore, there would be two bodies representing the same interests. 

On March 13, 2026 the AFN submitted it's response to the Tribunal regarding the NCCC's Notice of Motion seeking Interested Party status, maintaining it's position that the NCCC should be given the opportunity to participate but also clarifying their role and relationship with the NCCC.

On March 13, 2026 the Caring Society submitted its position to the Tribunal supporting the NCCC Notice of Motion seeking interested party status. 

On March 6, 2026, the Caring Society filed correspondence to the Tribunal ahead of the next case conference meeting regarding 2025 CHRT 6 and Jordan's Principle.  

On February 10th, 2026 the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal issued, 2026 CHRT 12, ruling on the inaudible recordings and missing transcripts.