On September 21, 2026, the Federal Court provided directions with respect to the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations’ motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80.

Throughout the month of September 2026, parties to the case filed their positions on the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations Notion of Motion for leave to intervene in Canada's Judicial Review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 1, 2026, the Confederacy of Treaty Six First Nations filed a Notion of Motion for leave to intervene in the judicial review filed by Canada on 2025 CHRT 80.

On September 22, 2026, Canada submitted its response to the Tribunal, requesting that the 39 orders sought in the Joint Motion be dismissed on the basis that they exceed the Tribunal’s remedial role, duplicate existing processes, and could impede ongoing improvements to Jordan’s Principle service delivery and backlog reduction.

On September 17, 2026, Canada submitted a notice of application for Judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal's August 18, 2026 letter decision regarding the Chairperson’s dismissal of Canada's request to reconstitute the three member Tribunal panel hearing the inquiry, with reasons to follow.

On September 9, 2026, Canada filed its record in the judicial review of 2025 CHRT 80. 

On September 9, 2026, the Caring Society filed a motion asking the Federal Court to strike or stay Canada’s judicial review application, arguing that the challenge is premature because the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal proceedings remain ongoing and no final decision has yet been made.

On September 9, 2026, the Caring Society, Assembly of First Nations, Chiefs of Ontario, and Nishnawbe Aski Nation filed a Joint Notice of Motion regarding Jordan's Principle compliance and implementation of 2026 CHRT 6 pursuant to the Tribunal's August 21, 2026, direction. 

On August 21, 2026, Canada filed a letter to the Tribunal regarding the recomposition of the panel.