Calendrier et documents
Le calendrier ci-dessous offre une chronologie de la cause du Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne sur le financement inéquitable pour les services de la protection de l’enfance des Premières Nations.
Vous pouvez ainsi consultez la chronologie des services de protections de l'enfance qui a précédé la cause.
Nous essayons de notre mieux pour vous donner accès à ces documents/ces informations en français. Malheureusement, les ressources ne sont pas toujours disponibles. Dans ce cas, nous allons les fournir en anglais. Désolé pour l'inconvénient.
2016
Caring Society submissions on Canada's failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders on Jordan's Principle
Caring Society submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on the human rights situation of Indigenous children in Canada
Caring Society submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on the human rights situation of Indigenous children in Canada
Caring Society submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on the human rights situation of Indigenous children in Canada
Caring Society submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on the human rights situation of Indigenous children in Canada
- File
Caring Society submission to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on the human rights situation of Indigenous children in Canada
AFN Special Chiefs Assembly Resolution on INAC’s Child Welfare Reform Engagement Strategy
- File
Updated with revised contact details! Information Sheet: Jordan’s Principle Questions and Answers
COO motion of non-compliance v. Attorney General of Canada
AFN motion of non-compliance v. Attorney General of Canada
NAN motion of non-compliance v. Attorney General of Canada
Caring Society motion of non-compliance v. Attorney General of Canada
Information Sheet: Implementing the CHRT Remedies - Canada’s Failure to Comply
NDP motion to force the government to comply with the Tribunal ruling and end discrimination against First Nations children passes unanimously in the House of Commons
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Information Sheet: Canadian Human Rights Tribunal Decisions on First Nations Child Welfare and Jordan’s Principle
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada submits its second compliance report to the Tribunal
- File
MP Charlie Angus (NDP) introduces a motion in the House of Commons to force the government to comply with the Tribunal ruling. The motion passes unanimously on November 1, 2016. Click below for full text of the motion and debate.
Manitoba legislature passes motion calling on Canada to comply with the CHRT decisions and implement Jordan's Principle.
Click below for full text of the motion and debate.
On Friday, October 3, 2016, INAC filed its First Nations child and family services (CFS) funding methodology and costing analysis with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. The attachments in the following .zip folder confirm that Budget 2016 and provincial/territorial CFS funding forecasts for future years were developed prior to the January 26, 2016 ruling.